Understanding the Four Mind Axes
The four mind axes are related to the manner in which we process information. These are Directivity, Associativity, Convergence, and Lexicality. Each one is crucial to the mind, and understanding how they work is crucial for understanding human cognition. But, the mind’s is not the same for all.
Associativity
Associativity of mind is a measure of way people think. People who have high Associativity tend to think in streams of thought rather than focusing solely on a particular subject or idea for extended periods of time. They are also susceptible to changing topics, creating many connections. Contrary to other typesof people, it’s not necessary to refer to disorganization or unfocusedness. The most important characteristic of Associativity is its capability to think in many different ways. People with high Associativity tend to be more adept at brainstorming, which is a natural trait.
The method is based on compass but also concentrates on internal cognitions of both axes. Its goal is to educate people about the processes of cognition as well as their role in forming patterns of communication. It is similar to Trixie’s Neurotypology however it is different in that it concentrates on the internal mental processes, rather than the external profiles of the mind.
Directivity
Mind axes are used to measure different aspects of the human mind, it is possible to assess the degree of directivity and divergence in various aspects of our thinking. Divergent thinking involves the creation of multiple ideas from a single input and the formation of free associations from it. It is in contrast to Directivity and Big Five Convergence, apti in which we attempt to design the most optimal solution from an array of data.
Convergence
Convergence between mind axes relates to a mental process in which we use our primary thinking axes. This axis of the brain is naturally wired for Global thinking and is positively connected to the Analytical Axis. It is also closely linked to System 2, which is the process of analysing and evaluating information in the form of a structured manner.
Lexicality
A system that focuses on cognition is crucial because it incorporates the concept of Lexicality. Mind Axes systems distinguish types based on cognitive content. They don’t rely on static characteristics or typologies. They operate more like a compass, which describes how an individual thinks about the world and people around them.
Two types of words were tested to determine the contrast between lexicality. One was a high frequency word, and the other an lower frequency word. High-frequency words were compared to low-frequency words and the two kinds were compared using lexicality contrast. Then, we tested for interactions between words with lexicality contrast as well as word frequency contrast. We also compared lexicality contrast with a fixation baseline.
The results indicated that imageability is affected by lexicality. High-frequency words are more activated than low-frequency words and they also show higher activation than nonwords. This is in line with previous research. The lexicality effects were also observed in the left inferior cerebellar, right cerebellar, and left fusiform region.
Lexicality plays a role in the representation of words like phonology, orthography, and semantics. These effects are equally important for Mind Axes processes that don’t rely on existing Lexical representations.
Impressionism
Impressionism is an art form from the late 19th century movement that sought to capture the fleeting quality of light and color as well as to explore the emergence of psychological concepts in relation to consciousness. The movement is primarily associated with the works of Monet, Manet, Renoir, and Cezanne. It is an artistic representation of Locke’s Modernist break with the empirical theory of knowledge.
While Seurat’s paintings are regarded as the most popular paintings of this style, Neo-Impressionism went beyond this and shifted into pointillism. Paul Signac, Henri Edmond Cross and other artists are notable examples of this period. Both of them were educated at the Ecole des Beaux-Arts, where George Seuret studied.
Laterality
Laterality of mind is the ability to perceive the indirect consequences and implications of a phenomenon. It is an essential component of motor dexterity, as well as the ability to act. But what makes a person think laterally? There are a myriad of factors that contribute to this ability. One factor that contributes to this ability is the thumb-palm complicated.
Laterality of mind is a reflection of differences in the way that each one hemisphere processes information. Some of these differences are more apparent for those who are left-handed, compared to those who are right-handed. For instance, those who are left-handed are more likely to use their right hemisphere for language, whereas those who are right-handed are more likely use their right hemisphere to perform spatial and visual processing. However, lateralisation can also be influenced by universal and personality general principles that govern the behavior of.
Cortical activity both in the left and right hemispheres appears to be dominant when the laterality of the mind axis has been assessed. Even when auditory and visual signals were combined the lateralization effect was evident. It was evident regardless of stimulus type.